This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 5, 2024. It is now read-only.
refresh asset database after revert#1008
Merged
StanleyGoldman merged 1 commit intogithub-for-unity:file-history-viewfrom Feb 12, 2019
Merged
refresh asset database after revert#1008StanleyGoldman merged 1 commit intogithub-for-unity:file-history-viewfrom
StanleyGoldman merged 1 commit intogithub-for-unity:file-history-viewfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thanks @sambonfire I'm working to land this for a release coming soon. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of the Change
Refresh asset database after reverting. This is necessary to make sure Unity is looking at the most up-to-date files. I didn't see that this was happening in this case so it's a pretty simple change.
Benefits
Users see accurate versions of file in Unity
Possible Drawbacks
It is possible it is a redundant call, but not from what I could tell.